Clear Stand Up Pouch with Zipper 1500ml
approx 1500ml, grip seal zipper · Material: Clear recyclable laminate Contact for price.
Buyers asking about pouch material structures, disposal routes and trade quoting. Compare the relevant catalogue ranges, then request a quote with the dimensions, contents, quantity and lead-time requirements.
Recyclable Pouch Material Quote searches usually come from buyers who already know the broad packaging type but still need to confirm the material, size, closure, label surface or film format. This page keeps the main website unchanged while giving Google a more specific page for that search intent.
For recyclable pouch material quote, compare Pouches and Labels together rather than treating each component as a separate purchase. A bottle may need a matching neck finish and cap, a pouch may need a particular capacity and barrier, a label may need a suitable adhesive, and film must match the product size and sealing method.
The catalogue is quote-led. Use the product links below to narrow the requirement, then send quantity, pack dimensions, intended contents, storage conditions and repeat-order expectations. Current pricing, stock and lead time can then be checked against the exact specification.
Where food-contact, tamper-evident, child-resistant, recyclable, moisture-resistant or chemical compatibility performance is important, confirm the supplier specification before use. This guide is designed to help prepare the enquiry, not to replace technical approval.
Start with the most relevant catalogue sections for this search, then request current trade pricing and compatibility checks.
These product pages connect the guide to the catalogue so buyers can compare examples before sending an enquiry.
Include the target product, dimensions, quantity, intended contents, closure or label requirement and the date the packaging is needed.
Start with the product format, size or capacity, material, closure or label requirement, intended contents, approximate quantity and whether the project is a sample, launch or repeat order.
Yes. Send the required quantity, dimensions, intended use and any compatibility checks through the quote route so current pricing, availability and lead time can be confirmed.
For this enquiry, the most relevant catalogue areas are Pouches and Labels. The linked product pages help narrow the requirement before quoting.
Yes. Recyclability, food-contact suitability, closure fit, liner compatibility and label adhesion depend on the exact material, supplier specification, contents and local recycling route, so confirm requirements before ordering.
A pouch can combine a printed web, barrier layer, sealant, zipper, valve, spout and cap. The front appearance or the phrase mono-material is not enough to determine compatibility or the collection route, so each component should be recorded against the exact pouch reference.
| Main web | Record the exact material structure, thickness where supplied, print and finish. “Kraft look” describes appearance and does not by itself identify a paper-only or recyclable structure. |
|---|---|
| Barrier need | Define moisture, oxygen, aroma, grease, light or other protection required by the real product and intended shelf life. Do not add an unsupported barrier layer only to satisfy a generic specification. |
| Sealant and seals | Confirm the sealant layer, sealing window and the effect of powders, oils or liquids in the seal area. Set acceptance criteria for peel, channel leaks and seal consistency. |
| Reclosure | Identify zipper material and position, opening force, usable area and whether the consumer must remove or separate any component. |
| Valve or fitment | For coffee valves or spouted pouches, record the valve, spout, cap and attachment material as part of the pack rather than assessing only the web. |
| Filling route | State hand fill, premade-pouch machine or another process, together with product temperature, particles, fill weight or volume, headspace and required output. |
| Claim evidence | Retain the supplier declaration for the complete construction, the current collection or return route, the date checked and the exact wording approved for artwork. |
A mono-material pouch still has to protect the product, seal reliably and work with the zipper, valve or spout. The most appropriate structure is the one that meets the verified barrier and process requirement while providing evidence for the intended recovery route. Replacing a proven laminate without a product and shelf-life review can create leakage, waste or product loss.
Current UK collection routes for flexible plastics differ from bottle collection. Recycle Now lists plastic bags and wrapping accepted at participating collection points; acceptance can vary by item and location. Organisations assessing household packaging for EPR should use the applicable UK recyclability assessment methodology.
Compare stand-up pouches with zip, spout pouches and the flexible spouted pouch range only after the required function is clear.
Send the contents, target fill, dimensions, gusset, required barrier, zipper or fitment, plain or printed route, quantity by artwork version, annual forecast and evidence requirements. Lancing will confirm current variants, minimum order, production or stock status, lead time and available declarations for the exact pouch. Machinery-filled projects should also be reviewed by the Lancing packaging machinery team.
The same nominal pouch size can be supplied in different structures and fitment configurations. A complete brief helps distinguish a material-development project from a stock-format enquiry and identifies where a representative filling and sealing trial is required.
| Contents and fill | Product form, particle size, oil/moisture/oxygen sensitivity, viscosity, fill weight or volume, filling temperature and filling method. |
|---|---|
| Pouch format | Flat, stand-up or flat-bottom; dimensions; gusset; colour; window; print; zipper; valve; spout; cap and opening method. |
| Functional structure | Required barrier, sealant, stiffness, puncture resistance and any known material preference, supported by supplier data for the selected web. |
| Sealing and line | Sealer type, jaw width, contamination risk, coding, inspection and whether the pouch must run through automated handling. |
| Commercial and evidence | First order, forecast, artwork status, required date, collection-market claim and technical documents needed. |
Compare structures in the mono-material versus laminated pouch guide and define protection needs with the barrier-properties guide.